MSHA announces ‘100 percent’ plan
From The Onion? No.Â MSHA (seriously) just announcedÂ “a new initiative to complete 100 percent of mandated regular inspections of all coal mines in the country.”Â Huh?Â A “new initiative” to do something that you are already required by statute to do?
Perhaps the Secretary of Labor Chao and Asst. Secretary Richard Stickler are a little irked at Ken Ward of the Charleston Gazette for publishing a number of stories in recent weeks, documenting that MSHA has failed to conduct its required inspections.Â Two of the stories (here and here) followed accidents in which coal miners were fatally injured, and Ward’s inquiries uncovered that MSHA had not conducted its required inspections at these mining operations.Â The fatality victims wereÂ Mr. Brent Reynolds, 35 atÂ a Mingo County, WV mine,Â and the other was Mr. Robert D. Fraley, 53 at a Logan County, WV mine.Â
Then, this week, Ken Ward wrote that in some MSHA districts, such asÂ southern WV and the regionÂ west of the Mississippi (the MSHA district responsible for the Crandall Canyon mine) the agency this year has only completed about 60% of its mandatory inspections.Â [Under the Mine Act, MSHA is required to inspect everyÂ underground coal, metal or non-metal mineÂ four times per year, and every surface mineÂ two times per year.]
In MSHA’s news release, the agency (cleverly) provides data on coal mine inspections for the years 2000-2006, but does not offer data for 2007.Â The news release notes “fiscal year 2007 data are not yet available.”Â (The fiscal year ended on September 30.)Â Well surely, the agency has data at least for the first three quarters of 2007, right?Â Â I fear that data was not released today because it will confirm what the Charleston GazetteÂ has already reported: one of the fundamentalÂ promises to miners in the Mine Act—mandatory wall-to-wall inspections—is not being kept, and the completion rate is far less than the agency wants to quantify.
2 thoughts on “News Flash: Agency announces it will do its job!”
The Assistant Secretary and the Senator’s wife made no mention of MSHA actually citing 100% of the violations. They only agreed to have inspectors start showing up. They did not agree to lift the order limiting citations.
For someone whose husband panders to dollars from organizations that promote “pro-life” (whatever that means) Elaine Chao sure has no qualms about causing a huge increase in workplace fatalities.
Dear Carl L.
You would do miners a potentially life-saving service if you would provide documentation of the “order limiting citations.” If you have evidence of that order, please bring it to the attention of an appropritae official (e.g., Dave McMaster in Senator Byrd’s office) or contact me and I can provide other suggestions to you. (My office number is 202-994-0774. You can remain anonymous.)
Most sincerely, Celeste