Our colleague Mark Catlin (SEIU and APHA OHS Section) has done it again, finding another amazing collection of historical films with worker safety themes.Â The latest were produced by the U.S. Federal Security Agency’s Office of EducationÂ in 1944, entitled “Problems in Supervision: Instructing Workers on the Job.”Â Â They were produced for the federal government by Caravel Films.Â Â Mark’s loaded one on YouTube he’s calledÂ “How not to do safety training”Â (00:01:06).Â Â
You’ll meet Mary, the new drill press operator, Fred the guy assigned to show her how to do the job, and their boss who off-handedly remarks “better remove that wrist watch, Mary” and tells Fred “fix her up with one of those new safety caps.”Â In today’s parlance, it’d be an example of an employer delegating safety training responsibility to aÂ “competent person” without any method to ensure the worker understood the training and couldÂ effectively apply it.Â Â The kicker in the 1 min film is when Fred says
“oh, andÂ read your safety book before you start to operate.”
What if Mary didn’t quite get the jig solidly into the drill, or didn’t tighten up the thumbscrews, or forgot to put a little oil on the drill, andÂ she suffered some ghastly injury.Â Â Would the big boss assert:
“Mr. Inspector, we teamed her up with our best operator.Â Â He made sure she had her safety cap, showed her how to operate the machine,Â andÂ told her to read the safety manual.Â Â It’s not our fault if she didn’t follow procedures.”Â
I know of at least one fatal injury that happened earlier this year, where this kind of debate is going on between OSHA and the employer—“he had the OSHA 10-hour, he was trained, he should have known better.”Â Â But the worker’s not around toÂ tell his side of the story.Â In this case, the company has predictably contested the citations (including 1 willful.)Â
I’m looking to the Solis’ Solicitor’s Office to fight mightily to defend the OSHA inspector’sÂ findings and conclusions.Â Â The company is going to argue their point of view,Â OSHA/SOL mustÂ be arguing forÂ workers’ lives.